{"id":41610,"date":"2017-06-08T16:23:19","date_gmt":"2017-06-08T13:23:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/?p=41610"},"modified":"2017-06-08T16:23:19","modified_gmt":"2017-06-08T13:23:19","slug":"referendum-pentru-romania","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/referendum-pentru-romania\/","title":{"rendered":"UN REFERENDUM PENTRU ROM\u00c2NIA"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"poza<\/a>\u00cen toamna anului 2015, Coali\u021bia pentru Familie a decis demararea procedurilor de revizuire a Constitu\u021biei Rom\u00e2niei pentru modificarea art. 48, alineat 1, FAMILIA, pentru a \u00eenlocui termenul \u201eso\u021bi\u201d cu exprimarea \u201eb\u0103rbat \u0219i femeie\u201d. Prin implicarea a cca. 80 de mii de voluntari, s-au str\u00e2ns aproape 4 milioane de semn\u0103turi de la cet\u0103\u021benii rom\u00e2niei, dintre care, \u00een vara lui 2016, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei a validat peste 3 milioane \u0219i le-a \u00eenaintat Parlamentului. Tot acest proces reprezint\u0103 UN DEMERS DEMOCRATIC F\u0102R\u0102 PRECEDENT \u00ceN \u021aARA NOASTR\u0102.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00cen luna mai a.c., Camera Deputa\u021bilor a adoptat propunerea legislativ\u0103 de revizuire a Constitu\u0163iei Rom\u00e2niei prin modificarea articolului 48 din Constitu\u021bie. <\/strong><\/strong>\u00cen plenul Camerei Deputa\u021bilor au fost prezen\u021bi \u00a0270 de parlamentari, dintre care 232 au votat pentru, 22 \u00eempotriv\u0103, 13 s-au ab\u021binut, iar 3 nu au votat.<\/p>\n

Urmeaz\u0103 ca proiectul s\u0103 fie analizat \u00een Senat, camer\u0103 decizional\u0103 \u00een acest caz. \u00cen cazul adopt\u0103rii \u0219i \u00een Senat, legea constitu\u021bional\u0103 trebuie promulgat\u0103 de pre\u0219edintele Iohannis, dup\u0103 care se va organiza un referendum \u00een care cet\u0103\u021benii vor decide dac\u0103 se modific\u0103 sau nu Constitu\u021bia. Pentru validarea referendumului este necesar\u0103 o prezen\u021b\u0103 de minim 30% din num\u0103rul persoanelor \u00eenscrise \u00een listele electorale.<\/p>\n

Justificarea demersului<\/strong><\/p>\n

Conform art. 48, alineat 1, din Constitu\u021bia Rom\u00e2niei, \u201eFamilia se \u00eentemeiaz\u0103 pe c\u0103s\u0103toria liber consim\u0163it\u0103 \u00eentre so\u0163i, pe egalitatea acestora \u015fi pe dreptul \u015fi \u00eendatorirea p\u0103rin\u0163ilor de a asigura cre\u015fterea, educa\u0163ia \u015fi instruirea copiilor.\u201d \u201eSo\u021bi\u201d este un termen vag \u0219i deschis interpret\u0103rilor \u0219i din acest motiv dorim revizuirea alineatului 1 al art. 48 astfel: \u201eFamilia se \u00eentemeiaz\u0103 pe c\u0103s\u0103toria liber consim\u0163it\u0103 \u00eentre \u00eentre un b\u0103rbat \u0219i o femeie, pe egalitatea acestora \u015fi pe dreptul \u015fi \u00eendatorirea p\u0103rin\u0163ilor de a asigura cre\u015fterea, educa\u0163ia \u015fi instruirea copiilor.\u201d<\/p>\n

Familia \u00eentemeiat\u0103 pe c\u0103s\u0103toria dintre un b\u0103rbat \u0219i o femeie este singura rela\u021bie interuman\u0103 ce asigur\u0103 mediul propice na\u0219terii, cre\u0219terii \u0219i educa\u021biei genera\u021biilor viitoare. Ca institu\u021bie fundamental\u0103 a societ\u0103\u021bii, ea asigur\u0103 continuitatea poporului rom\u00e2n. Mai mult dec\u00e2t at\u00e2t, familia este locul \u00een care valorile \u0219i tradi\u021biile rom\u00e2ne\u0219ti sunt transferate noilor genera\u021bii, iar tradi\u021biile \u0219i valorile rom\u00e2ne\u0219ti au, la baza lor, familia \u00eentemeiat\u0103 pe c\u0103s\u0103toria \u00eentre un b\u0103rbat \u0219i o femeie.<\/p>\n

Acest rol primordial pe care familia l-a avut de-a lungul istoriei Rom\u00e2niei are nevoie de protec\u021bia noastr\u0103, a tuturor, \u00een fa\u021ba tendin\u021belor societ\u0103\u021bii moderne de a-i diminua importan\u021ba. Faptul c\u0103 e nevoie de aceast\u0103 clarificare a exprim\u0103rii \u00een Constitu\u021bia Rom\u00e2niei arat\u0103 riscul de degradare a conceptului de familie, degradare ce va l\u0103sa urme ad\u00e2nci \u0219i grave \u00een societatea rom\u00e2neasc\u0103 at\u00e2t de mult \u00eencercat\u0103.<\/p>\n

Institu\u021bia familiei reprezint\u0103 mai mult dec\u00e2t iubirea membrilor s\u0103i, ea are o structur\u0103 public\u0103, roluri \u0219i func\u021bii juridice, reguli \u0219i roluri socializatoare [1]. Toate acestea, pe termen lung, asigur\u0103 optima dezvoltarea a genera\u021biilor viitoare \u0219i, implicit, a culturii \u0219i a statului rom\u00e2n.<\/p>\n

Familia st\u0103 la baza societ\u0103\u021bii \u0219i civiliza\u021biei umane \u0219i este una dintre institu\u021biile fundamentale ale umanit\u0103\u021bii. Statul rom\u00e2n este dator s\u0103 \u00eent\u0103reasc\u0103 protec\u021bia ei \u00een primul r\u00e2nd pentru c\u0103 este \u00een interesul \u0219i \u00een acord cu dorin\u021ba propriilor cet\u0103\u021beni (familia reprezint\u0103 pentru rom\u00e2ni o institu\u021bie social\u0103 important\u0103 \u0219i foarte important\u0103 a\u0219a cum reiese din numeroase studii: 98,5% \u2013 2008 [2]; 98,6% \u2013 2012 [3]).<\/p>\n

Familia format\u0103 prin unirea \u00een c\u0103s\u0103torie a unui b\u0103rbat cu o femeie, a fost \u0219i va r\u0103m\u00e2ne mediul cel mai potrivit pentru na\u0219terea, cre\u0219terea \u0219i dezvoltarea copiilor. Studiile cros-culturale \u0219i istorice au ar\u0103tat c\u0103 scopul principal al familiei a fost cre\u0219terea \u0219i protec\u021bia copilului. \u00cen \u021bara noastr\u0103, 96,7% dintre rom\u00e2ni simt c\u0103 copiii sunt importan\u021bi \u0219i foarte importan\u021bi pentru familie, iar 95,6% cred c\u0103 copiii au nevoie de ambii p\u0103rin\u021bi s\u0103 fie ferici\u021bi [2].<\/p>\n

Pentru noi, rom\u00e2nii, familia nu este \u201eun stil de via\u021b\u0103\u201d, ci este legat\u0103 fundamental de rolul de p\u0103rin\u021bi.<\/strong> Dac\u0103 acest rol esen\u021bial nu mai este luat \u00een considerare, familia se reduce la o simpl\u0103 recunoa\u0219tere guvernamental\u0103 a afec\u021biunii dintre doi cet\u0103\u021beni [4], iar modul \u00een care genera\u021biile viitoare se vor dezvolta devine incert.<\/p>\n

Institu\u021bia familiei creeaz\u0103 mai mult dec\u00e2t copii. Numeroase studii arat\u0103 c\u0103 bunurile sociale create, bunuri de care beneficiaz\u0103 at\u00e2t indivizii c\u00e2t \u0219i \u00eentreaga societate, sunt pe de o parte fundamentale dezvolt\u0103rii societ\u0103\u021bii, iar pe de alt\u0103 parte, comparativ cu alte situa\u021bii sociale, sunt superioare. Adul\u021bii c\u0103s\u0103tori\u021bi, \u00een compara\u021bie cu cei nec\u0103s\u0103tori\u021bi, c\u00e2\u0219tig\u0103 mai mult, sunt mai s\u0103n\u0103to\u0219i fizic \u0219i emo\u021bional, sunt mai ferici\u021bi, mai productivi, mai angaja\u021bi social, beau \u0219i fumeaz\u0103 mai pu\u021bin, tr\u0103iesc mai mult, au rate mai sc\u0103zute ale violen\u021bei domestice, g\u0103sesc via\u021ba a fi mai plin\u0103 de semnifica\u021bie \u0219i sens, cu impact pozitiv \u00een s\u0103n\u0103tatea lor psihic\u0103. [5]<\/p>\n

Copiii proveni\u021bi din p\u0103rin\u021bi c\u0103s\u0103tori\u021bi, fa\u021b\u0103 de copiii care provin din p\u0103rin\u021bi nec\u0103s\u0103tori\u021bi, sunt mai feri\u021bi de riscurile avortului, abuzurilor sau neglij\u0103rii; petrec mai mult timp cu ta\u021bii, au rezultate superioare la \u0219coal\u0103, ulterior se descurc\u0103 economic mai bine, au mai pu\u021bine probleme comportamentale sau emo\u021bionale, se expun mai pu\u021bin comportamentelor periculoase (abuz de substan\u021be, riscurile sexului premarital, BTS), au probabilitate mai sc\u0103zut\u0103 de divor\u021b c\u00e2nd ajung adul\u021bi. [6]<\/p>\n

Toate aceste lucruri subliniaz\u0103 superioritatea familiei bazate pe c\u0103s\u0103torie ca institu\u021bie social\u0103, o institu\u021bie ce, \u00een aceast\u0103 lume modern\u0103, are nevoie de protec\u021bia noastr\u0103. Familia este prima piatr\u0103 de temelie pe care trebuie s\u0103 o a\u0219ez\u0103m la baza viitorului nostru.<\/p>\n

\u00a0[1] David Blankenhorn, Marriage today is still good for children, wealth and civil society,\u00a0Deseret News<\/em>, 11\/14\/2014.<\/p>\n

[2] European Values Survey \u2013 2008.<\/p>\n

[3] World Values Survey \u2013 2012.<\/p>\n

[4] Traditional Marriage is Essential for a Healthy Society; http:\/\/www.familywatchinternational.org\/fwi\/documents\/FWIpolicybrieftraditionalmarriagefinal.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

[5] U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001.; Charlotte A. Schoenborn, \u201cMarital Status and Health: United States, 1999-2002,\u201d Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Number 351 (December 15, 2004).; Nadine F. Marks and James D. Lambert, \u201cMarital Status Continuity and Change Among Young and Midlife Adults,\u201d Journal of Family Issues 19 (November 1998); Lee, G., Seccombe, K., & Shehan, C. (1991). Marital status and personal happiness: An analysis of trend data. Journal of arriage and the Family, 53, 839-844.; Corey L.M. Keyes, \u201cSocial Civility in the United States,\u201d Sociological Inquiry 72 (2002); 393-408; Corey L.M. Keyes, \u201cThe Mental Health Continuum: From Languishing to Flourishing in Life,\u201d Journal of Health and Social Behavior 43 (2002): 207-222.; Kaplan, RM; Kronick, RG. \u201eMarital status and longevity in the United States population.\u201d Journal Of Epidemiology And Community Health 60: 760, 2006.;The Marriage License as Hitting License: A Comparison of Assaults in Dating, Cohabitating and Married Couples,\u201d Journal of Family Violence 4(2): 161-180.; W. Bradford Wilcox, Linda Waite and Aldex Roberts, \u201cMarriage and Mental Health in Adults and Children,\u201d Research Brief No. 4 (February 2007), available: http:\/\/center.americanvalues.org; The National Marriage Project, The state of our unions 2000: The social health of marriage in America (New Brunswick, NJ: The National Marriage Project, 2000). Sursele sunt colectate \u0219i indicate \u00een Outcomes According to Family Structure, http:\/\/www.familywatchinternational.org\/fwi\/documents\/FWIpolicybriefoutcomesfamily structure.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

[6] Andrea J. Sedlak & Dinae D, Broadhurst, \u201cThe Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect,\u201d U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996, xviii, 5-19; Jones RK, Darroch JE and Henshaw SK, Patterns in the socioeconomic characteristics of women obtaining abortions in 2000\u20132001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,2002, 34(5):226\u2013235.; Sandra L. Hofferth & Kermyt G. Anderson, \u201dAre All Dads Equal? Biological versus Marriage as a Basis for Paternal Investment,\u201d Journal of Marriage and Family 65 (February 2003): 213-222.; Kristin A. Moore et al., \u201cNonmarital School-Age Motherhood: Family, Individual, and School Characteristics,\u201d Journal of Adolescent Research 13, Number 4 (October 1998): 433-457.; Barbara Schneider, Allison Atteberry, and Ann Owens, Family Matters: Family Structure and Child Outcomes (Birmingham: Alabama Policy Institute, June 2005). ; Elizabeth Thomson et al., \u201cFamily Structure and Child Well-Being: Economic Resources vs. Parental Behaviors,\u201d Social Forces, 73 (September 1994): 221-242.; Tucker, Joan S., Friedman, Howard S., Schwartz, Joseph E. et al., Parental divorce: Effects on individual behavior and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 73(2), Aug 1997. pp. 381-391; Jane Mauldon, \u201cThe Effects of Marital Disruption on Children\u2019s Health,\u201d Demography 27 (1990): 431-446.; Kelly J. Kelleher, et al., \u201cIncreasing Identification of Psychosocial Problems: 1979-1996,\u201d Pedriatrics 105 (June 2000): 1313-1321.; Flewelling, Robert L, Bauman, Karl E.(1990). Family Structure as a Predictor of Initial Substance Use and Sexual Intercourse in Early Adolescence.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(1),171. Retrieved September 12, 2008, from Research Library database. ; Paul R. Amato & Danelle D. DeBoer, \u201cThe Transmission of Marital Instability Across Generations: Relationship Skills or Commitment to Marriage?\u201d Journal of Marriage and Family 63 (November 2001): 1038-1051.; Family Socioeconomic Status and Self-Reported Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among Black and White American Adolescents, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vol. 31, No. 9 (2004): 533-541. Sursele sunt colectate \u0219i indicate \u00een Outcomes According to Family Structure, http:\/\/www.familywatchinternational.org\/fwi\/documents\/FWIpolicybriefoutcomesfamilystructure.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

\u00a0Coali\u021bia pentru Familie<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"sigla<\/a><\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00cen toamna anului 2015, Coali\u021bia pentru Familie a decis<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alert-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41610"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41610\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.giurgiuveanul.ro\/stiri\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}